AMERICAN
NATIONAL DEFENSE-INTELLIGENCE
RETURN
TO
TOPICAL GUIDE AMER NATIONAL DEFENSE
LINK TO
FOREIGN AFFAIRS- IRAQ WMD
03/03/07 For Your Information: From
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellipedia
"Intellipedia is a series of three
wikis
that runs on
JWICS,
SIPRNet,
and
Intelink-U.
They are used by the 16 agencies that comprise the
United States
intelligence community.
It is not open to the public.
"Intellipedia is a project of the
Office of the Director of National
Intelligence (ODNI) —
DNI CIO IC Enterprise
Services|Intelligence Community Enterprise Services
(ICES) office headquartered in
Fort Meade,
Maryland.
As of
October 2006,
it contained 28,000 pages and 3,600 users.[1]
It includes information on the areas, people and issues of
interest to those communities. Intellipedia uses
MediaWiki,
the same software used by the
Wikipedia
free-content encyclopedia project.[2]
The ODNI says that the project will help revolutionize the
prevailing culture of the U.S. intelligence community, widely
blamed for failing to "connect the dots" before the attacks of
September 11, 2001.
"Sister projects are running on the
U.S. Government Secret-level network known as
SIPRNet
and the Sensitive but Unclassified Network (SBU).
SBU users can access Intellipedia from remote terminals outside
their workspaces via a
VPN. The
SIPRNet is intended to serve a similar purpose for U.S.
diplomats
and
Department of Defense
personnel who are the predominant users of this network.
OSINT
users share information on the unclassified network."
JES
12/07/06 Regarding the
Iraq Study Group
aka
How Best to Surrender Without
Telling Anybody Group,
up real close.
Click, and take a hard look yourself.
Analysis by the Mountain Observer currently a work
in progress. JES
11/01/06
Now as it turns out, in chasing
Osama bin Laden, perhaps we have not been chasing
the real guy, but a decoy so to speak. A new
theory is beginning to emerge within the
intelligence community that, perhaps, the real guy
is one Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, aka KSM, aka Mukhtar,
currently in detention somewhere as a guest of U.S.
intelligence assets. KSM is a member of al
Qaeda, but this was not always so. As Mukhtar,
he is described as the real mastermind behind the 09/11
attacks, as well as a number of the now well
documented al Qaeda attacks throughout the '90's.
He was captured 03/01/03 in Pakistan. The
link-up with al Qaeda seems to have occurred when
Osama bin Laden fled to Afghanistan from the Sudan,
as a matter of mutual interests. To more fully
understand the significance and importance of KSM,
it is necessary to reach back before the al Qaeda
link. KSM is a tribal product of
Baluchistan, a non existent nation much in the mold
of Kurdistan, more familiar to the West as a
challenge looming over the horizon. While
there is reason to believe we could do business with
a Kurdistan, such is not the case with a
Baluchistan. To
make a long story short, a very extended tribal
family of whom KSM is a part, was responsible for
the 1993 attack on the World Trade Center, some of
whom are now in jail. There is much,
much more to all of this, but I'll get to it later.
Meanwhile, for your information, Baluchistan touches
Iran, Afghanistan and Pakistan, and it is the
Iranian connection that arouses interest because of
some apparent cooperation between the Baluchistani's
and Saddam Hussein during the Iraqi-Iranian war.
Much more to follow, including the real objectives
and motives of what we have come to know as
IslamicFacism. JES
09/28/06 The difficulty with a Senate almost
evenly divided along partisan lines, in the more
subtle sense of Liberal v. Conservative, is the
power of individual Senators, drunk with
self-importance, to disrupt what is in the interest
of the polity, especially dangerous in times of war.
Dressed in apparently principled, but frequently
self-serving rhetoric, and perhaps even believing it
themselves, certain Senators seem not to be able to
resist the temptation to stand on the tracks of
history. So it is that a Senate, forced by a
similarly puffed up Supreme Court decision to extend
beyond recognition Article 3 of the Geneva
Convention, is charged with the duty of fabricating
a band-aid fix to the Court's transgression.
Enter John McCain, and two wannabes, offering
specious arguments irrelevant and counter-productive
to the issue at hand. The issue at hand is the
ability of American intelligence operatives to
question and obtain information from captured
terrorists without themselves being subject to
prosecution by either the so-called International
Court or Senator Dick Durbin and friends.
Finally, after weeks of political grandstanding, and
an explanation by the President that in the face of
an unsatisfactory product from Congress the relevant
programs would grind to a halt, the Senate caves,
having been thrown a couple of fish to ease the
hurt. Operations at Guantanamo will continue
in a fashion already much too comfortable for the
guests. JES
05/27/06
Excellent.
Air Force Gen. Michael V. Hayden gets the Senate's
green light as CIA director. JES
05/11/06 The National Security
Agency is checking your phone calls. Folks, hate to tell you this, but
this was old news 4 years ago; grow up. Armed with banks of super
computers, calls are automatically scanned for key buzz words, phrases and
connection patterns as in looking for the needle in the haystack.
Technology makes this possible, and for the security of this nation, you
best thank your lucky stars that this is so. The current Congressional
posturing on the matter is disingenuous in the extreme. Everyone in
Washington with a scintilla of awareness has known about this all along.
This Fall, vote for real Americans. JES
05/07/06 Time for further change at
the CIA, decades overdue. Short time Director, Porter J. Goss,
announced his resignation this past Friday, as the inside civilian (read
Liberal/Leftist) resistance to another way of thinking continues to fight a
guerilla war against reformers. Porter Goss was a civilian
outsider, brought in to fix things by President Bush, and who apparently has
not had the horsepower to deal as effectively, as will be necessary, with
the embedded resistance. Next up comes an old hand at these
issues who knows his way around the swamp: Air Force Gen. Michael Hayden.
This has got Democrats and the Left really spooked because here is a man who
apparently understands the game from the inside. The cry will be that
civilians are out of the intelligence business and that the military has
taken over, which says much about what the Left really thinks of the
military. The Left's real problem, however, is not civilian v.
military, but Liberal v. Conservative, a focus adjustment on data analysis
that will shift the product away from John Kerry style international
kiss-ass and cover up, and more toward a priority on actual American
national security. A CIA less concerned about hurting other
peoples feelings and more concerned about hard nosed reality is long
over-due. This likely will include the need to engage in some grubby
operations that need not be discussed. An observer needs to understand
all this to make sense of the debate about to ensue with the President's
nomination of Gen. Michael Hayden. The screaming and hollering
you will hear, originating from within the CIA, is evidence that progress is
being made against the problem. The same problem is also resident, to
a lesser degree, in the Department of Defense (check the political pedigree
of all those complaining Generals). Then, of course, we have
that enormous edifice of occasional Americans, the Department of State.
However a President has to start somewhere, and even if he is five years
late, certain of the President's failures are finally forcing him to act.
JES
04/24/06 Breaking story.
Treason, or so it might appear.
The CIA dismisses Mary O.
McCarthy, a highly placed intelligence officer. Perhaps the
infection of decades in various security sensitive federal agencies is about
to burst. The Mountain Observer prays for the soul of an old B-25 tail
gunner who we believe was right all along. The names have not
changed to protect the guilty. JES
03/18/06 The vast trove of captured
files from Saddam's Iraq are now being released by
direction of National
Intelligence Director John Negroponte
to the internet. Go to
http://www.dni.gov/release_letter_20060316.html Keep trying; it's
very busy, and will be for months. The warehouses in Baghdad and Dubai
are stuffed, and the government finally had to admit that at the pace they
were going (best guess, only 5% processed) it would take them years.
The new policy, totally unprecedented, is to ask for public help in
translation and analysis. Thank you Sen. Rick Santorum R-PA and
House Intelligence Chairman Peter Hoekstra, R-MI for pursuing this matter
with Mr. Negroponte.
Part of the government's problem has been finding reliable people who
understand Arabic. JES
01/11/06 Well, so now the rat has come out
from under the rock, too self invested to let the
opportunity of publicity escape. One Russell
Tice, burrowed deep in the National Security Agency,
admits to being the leaker to the New York Times on
matters concerning our intelligence war against
IslamicFacism, foreign and domestic. It
seems his security clearance was revoked last May,
and cut off from his sources, perhaps he was
concerned that his train ride into the sunset would
foreclose his golden opportunity to preen before the
cameras. A review of his comments to ABC
News reveals that the NSA was actually doing its job
quite well, which is basically the substance of his
complaint.
"The mentality [at the NSA] was we need to get these
guys, [al Qaeda types] and we're going to do
whatever it takes to get them". Well,
golly gee wizz, let's hear it for the NSA!
Now let us watch the New York Times and ABC News try
to sell Mr. Tice as a hero to Red State America.
Similarly situated elsewhere in the world, Tice, at
this point, would have found himself pushing up
daisies, but in this country we put a priority on
the civil rights of citizens, even traitors.
JES
12/17/05 The
Patriot Act expires on December 31.
Yesterday the Senate stumbled, and voted
re-authorization down. As an American
Nationalist Conservative, I share the concerns of
those honestly troubled about the future of
freedom for American citizens, as originally
understood. I have made that abundantly clear
throughout the history of the Mountain Observer,
including previous references to the Patriot Act.
So I do not question the motivations of those who
are honestly troubled by the implications of
the Patriot Act for the future of freedom in this
country. I share those concerns.
What I question is their judgment in the context
of the current situation that we, as a nation,
face with respect to the challenge of IslamicFacism.
The Patriot Act is not about George W. Bush.
It is about the defense of this nation.
Earlier this past week I had been led to believe
that a compromise had been worked out on certain key
details (12/11/05 below) which collectively made
great sense to me, originating with the premise
that, as a matter of fact, the President does need
these tools to responsibly discharge his duty to
defend this nation. We need to face up to a
real priority of immediacy, partially a price to be
paid for a sometimes willful disregard for reality
over, at least, the last 15 years. To not
re-authorize the Patriot Act immediately is on the
same level of irresponsibility as our national
inability, shared by both national parties, to get
control of our borders and immigration. In
fact it is largely due to our border and immigration
problems that the Patriot Act provisions have become
necessary. Don't be fooled by Democrats or
Liberal Republicans mouthing concern about the
Constitution; they don't give a flip about it as
evidenced by the rubber interpretations of their
judges over too many decades. This nation
needs to wake up, or the winds of hell will sooner
or later be upon us. JES
12/19/05 For
those of you actually interested in the President's
legal authority regarding domestic intelligence, you
might begin by roaming around
http://www.llrx.com/features/military.htm.
But like myself, you will need to hire competent
legal council to actually understand it. JES
12/17/05 The
Patriot Act expires on December 31.
Yesterday the Senate stumbled, and voted
re-authorization down. As an American
Nationalist Conservative, I share the concerns of
those honestly troubled about the future of
freedom for American citizens, as originally
understood. I have made that abundantly clear
throughout the history of the Mountain Observer,
including previous references to the Patriot Act.
So I do not question the motivations of those who
are honestly troubled by the implications of
the Patriot Act for the future of freedom in this
country. I share those concerns.
What I question is their judgment in the context
of the current situation that we, as a nation,
face with respect to the challenge of IslamicFacism.
The Patriot Act is not about George W. Bush.
It is about the defense of this nation.
Earlier this past week I had been led to believe
that a compromise had been worked out on certain key
details (12/11/05 below) which collectively made
great sense to me, originating with the premise
that, as a matter of fact, the President does need
these tools to responsibly discharge his duty to
defend this nation. We need to face up to a
real priority of immediacy, partially a price to be
paid for a sometimes willful disregard for reality
over, at least, the last 15 years. To not
re-authorize the Patriot Act immediately is on the
same level of irresponsibility as our national
inability, shared by both national parties, to get
control of our borders and immigration. In
fact it is largely due to our border and immigration
problems that the Patriot Act provisions have become
necessary. Don't be fooled by Democrats or
Liberal Republicans mouthing concern about the
Constitution; they don't give a flip about it as
evidenced by the rubber interpretations of their
judges over too many decades. This nation
needs to wake up, or the winds of hell will sooner
or later be upon us. JES
12/11/05 The
tentative agreement between the Senate and the House
on renewal of the Patriot Act is actually fairly
sensible. Certain minor adjustments have been
made that improve Constitutional protections as well
as clarify certain procedural guidelines for
security enforcement. If these provisions are
passed intact, the Mountain Observer endorses the
product. JES
11/17/05 Old Washington Post investigative
reporter Bob Woodward throws his friends on the Left
under the bus and destroys Special prosecutor
Patrick J. Fitzgerald’s case against Vice president
Richard Cheney’s chief of staff, I. Lewis "Scooter"
Libby Jr. Personal ambition, or belated
contrition, whatever the case may be, makes great
theater. The circles of rage on the Left
against Bush (and don't be fooled- all
Conservatives) will now be kicked to a still higher
level. Those of good character will stand
tall; weenies will jump ship. Thank you Vice
president Richard Cheney. In any event,
Woodward's disclosures allow us to ask questions
about the motivations of Patrick J. Fitzgerald's
course of investigation. The fundamental
question was whether or not Valerie Plame was
covert, or not, at the time of the incidents in
question. Did the Special prosecutor ever
think to pick up the phone and call the CIA?
The answer is that she was not, according to the
law, (ask
Victoria Toensing, author of the
Intelligence Identity Protection Act)
one of the worst kept secrets in DC for years.
But that's too simple, and would have spoiled the
opportunity for, I repeat, great theater. JES
10/29/05
Regarding the CIA leak investigation into possible violations of the
Intelligence Identity Protection Act.
Vice president
Richard Cheney’s chief of staff, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby Jr. was indicted
yesterday, on charges of perjury, obstruction of justice and making false
statements with respect to the investigation. None of these charges allege
violation of the Intelligence Identity Protection Act itself, but
rather, violation of other federal law designed to trip up potential
witnesses with their own words in the course of an investigation, ala Martha
Stuart. If found guilty. Mr. Libby’s real error will have been not to
employ the “memory loss” strategy used so successfully by O J Billyboy and
Hillary Rodham. The Mountain Observer does not defend Mr. Libby, if wrong
doing under the law can be proven to have occurred. What concerns the
Mountain Observer is the long term effect on recruiting good people for
sensitive positions in the future, knowing the liability of exposing
themselves to genuine memory loss regarding past events. (What, exactly,
did you say to your wife 2 years ago, date, time and place?, etc, etc).
The “he said, she said” conundrum is being criminalized, and subject to
political fishing expeditions under the skirts of the law. It seems to be another
manifestation of the criminalization of thought that the Mountain Observer
pointedly discusses in the original Mission Statement of this website.
Special
prosecutor Patrick J. Fitzgerald’s problem is that he can’t herd cats. By
his own admission, he cannot determine any violation of the Intelligence
Identity Protection Act by anyone in the absence of the ability to
determine who really said what to whom and when. So what he has done here
is to elevate the temperature on a target of interest, hoping to get some
birds to sing louder, while correctly pointing out to the hyenas on the Left
that it is an error to presume any guilt on anyone’s part regarding the
issue of violations of the Intelligence Identity Protection Act.
There is a long list of documented facts that point the finger right
straight back at the CIA, as an organization, on this entire matter. As for
the prosecutor’s efforts, again go to:
http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/iln/osc/index.html
JES
11/10/05 Regarding my comments 11/09/05
concerning the need for a new
Special
prosecutor on intelligence leaks. Perhaps his
attention should be focused on Congress itself, and
the consequences of acts of sabotage against the
relevant Agencies and Departments, harboring their
own fifth column provocateurs. JES
11/09/05 Let us see:
Lewis
"Scooter" Libby Jr. was indicted 10/28, not for any
violation of the Intelligence
Identity Protection Act, but for lying to investigators regarding dates,
times and places, and among the savvy attention is
re-focused on
Valerie Plame, her ubiquitous husband and the CIA.
Days later (could it be a coincidence?), another
leak surfaces from the CIA concerning detention
centers for terrorists in out of the way places (I
hope this is true, but that is not the point here).
Months ago the Mountain Observer raised the point,
several times, about political dysfunction in the
CIA, the State Department and the FBI, meaning
agencies out-of-control and off on their own
agendas. This is not a new development under
George W. Bush, but a malignancy the has been
building for decades. By all means, a
Special
prosecutor is
called for, this time pointed in the Left direction.
His charter should also include the Department of
Defense (Able Danger) and relevant congressional
staffs, past and present. JES
10/29/05
Regarding the CIA leak investigation into possible violations of the
Intelligence Identity Protection Act.
Vice president
Richard Cheney’s chief of staff, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby Jr. was indicted
yesterday, on charges of perjury, obstruction of justice and making false
statements with respect to the investigation. None of these charges allege
violation of the Intelligence Identity Protection Act itself, but
rather, violation of other federal law designed to trip up potential
witnesses with their own words in the course of an investigation, ala Martha
Stuart. If found guilty. Mr. Libby’s real error will have been not to
employ the “memory loss” strategy used so successfully by O J Billyboy and
Hillary Rodham. The Mountain Observer does not defend Mr. Libby, if wrong
doing under the law can be proven to have occurred. What concerns the
Mountain Observer is the long term effect on recruiting good people for
sensitive positions in the future, knowing the liability of exposing
themselves to genuine memory loss regarding past events. (What, exactly,
did you say to your wife 2 years ago, date, time and place?, etc, etc).
The “he said, she said” conundrum is being criminalized, and subject to
political fishing expeditions under the skirts of the law. It seems to be another
manifestation of the criminalization of thought that the Mountain Observer
pointedly discusses in the original Mission Statement of this website.
Special
prosecutor Patrick J. Fitzgerald’s problem is that he can’t herd cats. By
his own admission, he cannot determine any violation of the Intelligence
Identity Protection Act by anyone in the absence of the ability to
determine who really said what to whom and when. So what he has done here
is to elevate the temperature on a target of interest, hoping to get some
birds to sing louder, while correctly pointing out to the hyenas on the Left
that it is an error to presume any guilt on anyone’s part regarding the
issue of violations of the Intelligence Identity Protection Act.
There is a long list of documented facts that point the finger right
straight back at the CIA, as an organization, on this entire matter. As for
the prosecutor’s efforts, again go to:
http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/iln/osc/index.html
JES
10/21/05 Regarding the matter of CIA leaks and possible improper
White House involvement, DOJ Special Counsel
Patrick J. Fitzgerald has just launched a special website,
apparently for the purpose of rumor control. While the Mountain Observer
certainly has thoughts on the matter, information on what is actually going
on is in short supply. Right or wrong, what Fitzgerald actually winds up
doing is what is important. One hopes he is able to do his job well. Go
to
http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/iln/osc/index.html
. JES
09/09/05 Yesterday,
as Democrats, the Press and
Travis County
Persecutor
Ronnie Earle continue to chase after Tom Delay, former National Security Advisor, (to
OJ Billyboy) Samuel R. Burglar was fined $50,000 by
U.S.
Magistrate Judge Deborah Robinson, in addition to other penalties and loss
of clearance for 3 years. This, of course, for routinely squirreling away
classified documents in his pants and socks, apparently for review in
anticipation of the need to defend his ex-boss. Watch for possible
developing connections to issues being raised in the Able Danger affair
before Congress. JES
08/19/05 We watch
with fascination the unfolding story of Able Danger, and the rapidly
shifting positions of various members of the 09/11 Commission.
As I pointed out a year ago, the 09/11 Commission could never have been
expected to function to its public charter under the political stresses of
an election year. However, our national security was, and still is,
the real issue, and the facts will necessarily surface eventually. We
will be re-visiting the Able Danger issue from time to time as the Mountain
Observer can come to be convinced of the details. At this point I
would not advise betting on the quality of the OJ Billyboy Legacy. JES
08/19/05 We watch
with fascination the unfolding story of Able Danger, and the rapidly
shifting positions of various members of the 09/11 Commission.
As I pointed out a year ago, the 09/11 Commission could never have been
expected to function to its public charter under the political stresses of
an election year. However, our national security was, and still is,
the real issue, and the facts will necessarily surface eventually. We
will be re-visiting the Able Danger issue from time to time as the Mountain
Observer can come to be convinced of the details. At this point I
would not advise betting on the quality of the OJ Billyboy Legacy. JES
05/16/05 Very
shortly, headlines will re-appear concerning renewal of the Patriot Act,
and much demagoguery will ensue from predictable sources, attempting to
mis-lead the ill-informed about what's really at issue. To make a long
story short, The Mountain Observer supports the renewal of the Act, as is,
including the retention of its sunset provisions. JES
03/31/05
During the course of last year's election campaign Congress, and the press,
engaged in much political showboating over intelligence failures, which had
less to do with discovery and more to do with invention in support of narrow
political agendas. I pointed out at the time that the
President had appointed an Independent Intelligence Commission to report
in March 2005, after the election and allowing more time for a more
professional investigation. It has been apparent for some time
that there were failures, but we really need to understand what happed,
which is what this Commission was really all about. That report
was released this morning. JES
RETURN TO
TOPICAL GUIDE AMER NATIONAL DEFENSE
LINK TO
FOREIGN AFFAIRS- IRAQ WMD
FMOWEB 110-081 AMER NATIONAL DEFENSE-INTELLIGENCE